<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rjpotts.com &#187; Macworld &#8217;09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjpotts.com/tag/macworld-09/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjpotts.com</link>
	<description>My World Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FileMaker 10.0</title>
		<link>http://www.rjpotts.com/2009/01/05/filemaker-100</link>
		<comments>http://www.rjpotts.com/2009/01/05/filemaker-100#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjpotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FileMaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macworld '09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjpotts.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today FileMaker unleashed version 10 of its database at Macworld &#8217;09. Being part of the developers program I&#8217;ve had a copy of it for about a mounth now. Yes it sports a new interface, a few new bells and whisles, but there are quite a few things that it needs in order for it replace [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today FileMaker unleashed version 10 of its database at Macworld &#8217;09.  Being part of the developers program I&#8217;ve had a copy of it for about a mounth now.  Yes it sports a new interface, a few new bells and whisles, but there are quite a few things that it needs in order for it replace MS Access as my prefered desktop database.</p>
<p><strong>Pivot Tables</strong><br />
In my opinion one of MS Access&#8217;s strongest features over FileMaker is its ability to perform piviot tables.  Yes you can export your data from FileMaker into MS Excel and perform piviot tables but why?  I want to make self contained desktop database applications.</p>
<p><strong>Views/Queries</strong><br />
In real SQL RDBMSs (ORACLE, MS SQL Server, Sybase, MySQL) they are called Views.  In reality it is a stored query that looks and behaves just like a table (for the most part).  In MS Access its called a Query.  I want to be able to create views from a subset of a table, or multiple tables.  Use them to make other views, forms, or reports.  I&#8217;ve been asking for this since I started using FileMaker Pro 7.0.  That&#8217;s almost eight years.</p>
<p><strong>Graphs</strong><br />
Sure there are third party plugins that one can buy to give them the ability to build grafts into their forms and reports.  But if you ust spent $300 &#8211; $500 dollars for a desktop database system why should you have to go spend extra to have the ability to add graphs to your forms and reports?  Again something that I&#8217;ve been asking for since version 7.0.</p>
<p><strong>A True Programming Environment</strong><br />
In Oracle you have PL/SQL, in MS SQL and Sybase you have T-SQL, in MS Access they are called modules (or something like that).  The ability to create stored procedures and functions, the raw power to make your database perform amazing things.  I&#8217;ve simplified this a little but any database developer worth their weight in gold knows what I&#8217;m talking about.  For everyone else there is the ability to create those little things FileMaker calls &#8220;scripts&#8221;, MS Access calls them Macros.  I want an editor that uses syntax highlighting, where I can actually type in what I want the database to do.  Not this find the macro on the left, double click, and fill-in-the blank crap.  Its to limiting.  While I&#8217;m at it how about some good tutorials on how to write plugins.  I&#8217;ve yet to find one of those.</p>
<p>These are just a few things that I think would make FileMaker database products shine.  Personally if I had been the person put in charge of their developers this is what I would have focused on vs. Bento.  Bento isn&#8217;t even cross platform, but that&#8217;s another story for another time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rjpotts.com/2009/01/05/filemaker-100/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
